Changing of Merchant Accounts and Implement Surcharging
Proper Research and Planning Can Prevent Costly Mistakes
Overview: Many auto dealers are reevaluating how they process credit card transactions—some switch merchant accounts due to system compatibility, while others seek lower transaction fees. However, making this decision without thorough research can lead to unexpected challenges, impacting operations, customer satisfaction, and profitability.
Background: A smaller auto dealership group with multiple locations was facing rising credit card processing fees, cutting into profit margins. Leadership sought a cost-effective solution that would offset expenses without negatively impacting customers. After evaluating options, the group chose to implement credit card surcharging, shifting transaction fees to customers paying via credit card.
Challenges
- Compliance – Credit card surcharges are governed by state laws and card network regulations. The dealership group had to ensure compliance, including proper customer notifications, clear disclosures, and adherence to fee limitations. They also had to address credit card payments from fleet and extended warranty companies, which were exempt from surcharges.
- Customer Perception -Customers were accustomed to zero-fee transactions. While many industries were already adopting surcharging, customer education was necessary to maintain satisfaction.
- Technology Upgrades – New payment terminals were required to ensure proper fee disclosure and automatic surcharge calculation. Additionally, integration with the dealerships’ DMS system enabled electronic invoicing and text/email payment links.
- Employee Training – Both customer-facing staff and business office teams needed training on the new system, including charge acceptance, refunds, and reconciliation processes.
- Operational Consistency – Each dealership had unique cost-saving goals and was given flexibility to select vendors. This created variation in payment processing, affecting uniformity across locations.
- Transition Management – Chargebacks and refunds occurred after initial transactions, requiring continued access to the old merchant account for post-transaction adjustments.
Solution
The dealership group partnered initially with two different payment processing vendors specializing in compliant surcharging:
- Legal & Compliance Review: Vendors provided legally compliant terminals that informed customers before transactions about surcharges. The dealership remained liable for debit card fees, and fleet and warranty payments were processed separately using the old system.
- Customer Communication Strategy: A clear messaging campaign was launched to inform customers about surcharging, emphasizing that cash and debit payments remained fee-free. Notices were placed throughout the dealership two months before implementation.
- Technology Implementation: New processing systems ensured automated surcharge calculation and compliance. Additional IT security measures and network improvements (WiFi signal testing for wireless terminals) were completed.
- Staff Training Program: Staff received comprehensive training on transaction processing, fee explanations, refunds, and reconciliation procedures.
- Standardization Across Locations: Some dealerships initially opted for a beta-testing vendor that integrated with their service MPI tool, but faced issues with bank debit transaction limits and NSF errors. After nine months, they switched to the primary vendor for better reliability, despite higher monthly fees.
Results
- Significant Cost Recovery: The dealership reduced merchant account fees by approximately $200,000 per year (an 80% savings).
- Smooth Adoption: Despite initial concerns, clear communication eased resistance. Many customers switched to debit payments to avoid surcharges, further reducing costs.
- Operational Efficiency: The automation of reconciliation processes cut manual efforts by 90%, eliminating dependency on thermal paper receipts and manual batching. Additionally, transactions were now trackable by employee, improving resolution efficiency.
- Competitive Advantage: By maintaining competitive vehicle pricing and providing alternative payment options, the dealership avoided lost sales while protecting profitability.
Key Takeaways
- Transparency matters – Clear customer communication maintains trust and minimizes disruptions.
- Vendor selection is critical – Avoid beta-testing new solutions without a proven track record, but don’t overpay for unnecessary features. A structured RFP process helps ensure the right decision.
- Proper planning is essential – Train employees thoroughly and ensure full technology alignment before rollout.
- Surcharging should be part of a broader financial strategy – Cost recovery must be balanced with customer experience and operational efficiency.
Although the dealership group faced early challenges, they successfully transitioned to credit card surcharging, demonstrating how careful planning, vendor selection, and communication can optimize profitability without disrupting customer relationships.